Gaokao has killed creativity in education有人说高考扼杀了教育的创造力，你同意么？ 时间:2018-06-06 单词数:4560
双语 中文 英文
The gaokao system may have served as a relatively effective way to select students based on meritocracy in the past, but it should be reformed today.
Gaokao is designed to provide a level-playing field for all students in China to compete for limited spots in top universities in the country. But it lacks flexibility, has reinforced our singular perception of talents, entrenched inequality, and killed creativity in education.
The simplest argument to make is that students are humans too, and there can be circumstances in which people underperform compared to other occasions. Students deserve a chance to improve, and they shouldn’t be penalized by having to wait – or waste – a year if they somehow didn’t do as well as they should have done.
Moreover, the psychological impact of one single exam which can determine your future is overwhelming. Knowing that one precarious mistake can be fatal and you won’t be given a chance to give it another shot until a year later – that’s simply brutal.
Gaokao is supposed to promote equality, because everyone is admitted to college based on their score. But in fact, different cities or provinces are subject to a quota and cap system, which allows more enrolment for local students, even if they score lower than their peers from other provinces.
This means that students from Beijing or Shanghai, where most of the country’s best universities are located, will have an unfair advantage over students from places with fewer educational resources.
Students should be allowed to be different and to be creative in schools. But the gaokao score is almost the only criteria for students’ admission to universities. That means gaokao makes it compelling– for students to prioritize their exam scores more than other talents and traits.
Students’ performance in these exams are largely based on rote learning, and thus students with talents in other areas – such as public speaking, leadership, communication and even computer science – are significantly undervalued.
The biggest problem with the gaokao is not the exams, but the fetish it has helped to entrench. As if people who score higher in these exams will automatically be more successful in society.
Human intelligence is dynamic, and each individual has their unique talent and potential. So there shouldn’t be a universal standard to evaluate every student. In a way, it would be a more fair and comprehensive to evaluate individuals’ other traits and qualities. The best education system doesn’t just let students compete to be the best, but allows students to become the best of themselves.
The market is changing every single day, and the education system must adapt to these changes. Skills valued at school may no longer serve society’s interests or meet the market’s demand by the time students graduate.
01Hotter years ’mean lower exam results’ 05.31哈佛重要研究：天气热，学生考试成绩更差
02Eight-year-old who waited patiently for the president’s attention steals the show by getting a kiss on the head as Trump signs ’Right to Try’ into law06.01特朗普"嫉妒"8岁小男孩:我要长他这样,早当总统了
03Trump is starting a global trade war06.03特朗普正在挑起一场全球贸易战
04New generation sees alternatives to gaokao06.02高考重要，但不是我们的唯一出路
05What we can learn from Xi’s childhood06.01六一儿童节，看看习大大的童年是如何度过的
06As Asians get rich and healthy, ’smart crops’ replace rice on future menus05.30随着亚洲经济发展，“智能作物”将取代米饭地位
07Two of the world’s biggest brands are now Chinese05.30全球最有价值品牌名单出炉，中国首次夺得两个顶级名牌
08Opinion：For Trump, the Challenges From China Multiply05.30观点：美中全球角力全面铺开，特朗普该如何接招？
09Tencent pledges to advance China’s chip industry after ZTE ’wake-up’ call05.31腾讯承诺在中兴通讯“觉醒”后推进中国芯片产业
10U.S. Tariff Threat Could Scuttle Planned Trade Talks With China05.31评论：美国关税威胁或令美中贸易谈判计划搁浅